After 13 years at Talksport James Whales had his contract terminated for urging listeners to vote for Boris in the mayoral elections. Given the current state of the law it would naturally be wrong to criticise Talksport for their decision to fire Whales. But the fact they felt compelled to take such action speaks volumes about the extent to which the regulation of broadcast media inhibits free speech.
When I get into the office in the morning I read through the papers; Sun, Times, Guardian, Telegraph, and Daily Mail. What they all share in common is the freedom with which they express political bias - there’s no restriction on their ability to urge readers to vote for candidate X or Y (indeed the Evening Standard made no bones about their candidate of choice in the mayoral election).
I’ve never understood the logic of the broadcast media restrictions; are viewers less able to make intelligent decisions than readers? Am I more likely to be swayed by Sky News than the Times? No and No.
Perhaps it’s time the law reflected reality…
Posted by jaybs on May 6th, 2008 at 4:44 pm:
When I heard this about James Whale early this morning it annoyed me, I may not always agree with Whale but I respect his opinion, I think he is good when he does the Sky News early morning newspaper reviews.
Having always worked in commercial radio I know how tight restrictions are, but I have heard worse that few complained have been filed about, I wonder if most of all the complaints can be traced computers from one office in central
London?
You only have to watch Sky News and Adam Boulton, I often feel he is voice of New Labour on TV? well the connection is in the family? - Adam gave poor Gordon a very easy ride Sunday!